<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8368142029900180138</id><updated>2011-04-21T17:37:50.099-07:00</updated><title type='text'>TRUTESTER KINESIOLOGY TOOL</title><subtitle type='html'>Discussions on kinesiology, EFT, Carlos Castaneda, David Hawkins, muscle testing, psychic and paranormal phenomena, core beliefs, Roger Callahan, Gary Davis and Gegory Nicosia</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trutester.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8368142029900180138/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trutester.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>zzdust</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02505403727695931135</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8368142029900180138.post-3489540153248851571</id><published>2008-12-16T17:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-16T18:00:16.536-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Using TruTester to Predict the Future</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;Virtually 90% of the mail I receive deals with customers who are perplexed as to why TT is not being accurate for them in predicting the future. For example, "When I test, &lt;em&gt;Bill is going to call.&lt;/em&gt; it comes up Yes, but then Bill doesn't call!" &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;So this is a good time to remind TT users that kinesiology can only read thought fields that have &lt;em&gt;already been created&lt;/em&gt; - or thought, as it were. Therefore, the proper way to tell if Bill is going to call would be something like this:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;1. Bill is presently thinking about calling me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;2. Bill has thought about definitely calling me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;3. In Bill's mind, he has decided to call me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;All the statements have to be in the present tense. And what you have to do is be a little creative and try and select the thoughts he has already had that will divulge whether or not he is going to call.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#6600cc;"&gt;Sports Picks &amp;amp; Gambling&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;When I first invented TruTester I had amazing success - virtually flawless - in selecting winning stocks and picking football games. In fact, I was 12 out of 12 on the first Sunday I used it to pick the day's outcomes. The payout on that parlay would have been somewhere over 10 million smackers had I bet just ten dollars! (Of course, you would not be reading this now if I had done that! And I'll just leave it at that . . . )&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I have been using TT once again to pick football games - and I have a system that so far is 100%. And let me say that while some may think that using AK to pick football games is counter to its basic philosophy, I say hogwash. The process is very enlightening, and I also must say that the money I used to make betting football online kept me afloat for several years. In these times it could be a real godsend for some people and families - and I am happy to pass this along for free. May you make millions (and remember me when you do!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, I used to test, "XXX Team wins the game." And then the opposite. Or, "XX Team will win the game." And all sorts of similar statements. They didn't work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's what is working so far. First, I do not test if the team is going to win at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead, I make readings of the present levels of the quarterbacks and also the team in general using a scale of 1-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was right this week. And it was right last week when I tested just before the start of the games.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I tested the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"On a scale of 1 to 10 with ten being highest level of peak performance and one being the lowest, Ben Roethlisberger is over 5. Test.  Over 6. Test.  Over 7. Test." And so forth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I concluded that he and the Steelers were at 9 and 8, while the Ravens and their quarterback, Flacco were at 7+ and 8. I could "feel" a squeaker as I got my results. And I predicted Pittsburgh by 3. They won by four in a big upset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The week previous I did the same thing. And won. I should also mention that I was perfectly neutral about the outcome as I was not betting any money. An important factor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you should get that both teams' quarterbacks are at 7 then what you do is test them on a new scale of 7.1, 7.2 and so on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also tested quickly. And I also got &lt;em&gt;very clear&lt;/em&gt; results. Very high differentials. No question about the readings. For best results make your readings just before the game. And if you're betting money, have someone else make tests as well &lt;strong&gt;who is not betting&lt;/strong&gt; to keep the readings neutral and for validation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For more information visit &lt;a href="http://www.trutester.com/"&gt;www.trutester.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8368142029900180138-3489540153248851571?l=trutester.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trutester.blogspot.com/feeds/3489540153248851571/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://trutester.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-trutester-to-predict-future.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8368142029900180138/posts/default/3489540153248851571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8368142029900180138/posts/default/3489540153248851571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trutester.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-trutester-to-predict-future.html' title='Using TruTester to Predict the Future'/><author><name>zzdust</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02505403727695931135</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry></feed>
